• Save the trees!

    From JIM WELLER@1:123/140 to MICHAEL LOO on Saturday, August 25, 2018 16:54:00

    Subj: 182 food p'izening

    Britain and Europe [...] have virtually eliminated salmonella

    Not to say that we can't, just that we won't barring a major
    paradigm shift.

    They are ahead of NA in many ways but they get labelled statist and
    socialist which scares a lot of people here. But enough said about
    that.

    I guess your situation is similar

    It is.

    Subj: 187 lung

    CFIA ... "Although several parts of a carcass may be salvaged
    and sold as such for human consumption, their incorporation
    into prepared meat products in a registered establishment would
    constitute adulteration (e.g. spleens, brains). Refer to
    Section 21 of the Meat Inspection Regulations, 1990 for more
    details."

    Several is an odd term in this context.

    It's clarified in section 21 of the attendant regs which goes into
    elaborate and specific detail. Amending legislation requires
    parliamentary approval and happens infrequently but regulations
    within the overall framework can be changed and updated easily by
    senior bureaucrats.

    Subj: Fire in the sky

    pine and birch recipes [...] perhaps I can [...] eat locally
    after all.

    But are you trying to get rid of those trees? Seems you guys
    ought to cherish all the trees you can raise.

    My stepson Ray is a staunch environmentalist and Neekha absorbed his
    philosophy as best as a child can when she was young. She was
    three when I asked her if she wanted to go into the bush with me to
    harvest a small Christmas tree. She excitedly ordered me not to cut
    down any trees because "we need them to breathe!"

    Restaurant review and a caution: The Bubba Gump Shrimp Company

    Perhaps everyone here is already familiar with this American chain
    but I had not heard of it before. It just opened up its first
    Canadian franchise in Edmonton and Roslind attended it with the kids
    and grandkids (I was stuck in YK so this review is second hand.)

    Positives: The food was reasonably tasty and of adequate quality if
    not memorable. Service was OK.

    Negatives:

    It's a stupid concept restaurant dreamt up for Paramount Pictures to
    capitalize on the movie and then sold to Landry's in Texas.

    It's located on "Bourbon Street" another phony corporate theme in
    that dreaded behemoth, West Edmonton Mall, surrounded by other lame,
    waste of good money chains like East Side Mario's, Moxie's and Tony
    Roma's.

    The name is hokey.

    The stupid logo is hokey.

    The menu has not just seafood and southern food but had all the
    stock chain items like chicken wings and Caesar salad, and a
    mishmash of culinary themes: Cajun Chicken sandwiches, popcorn
    shrimp with pepperoncini, Maine lobster tails with Cajun spices,
    coconut shrimp, Maker's Mark Glazed Salmon with creamed spinach etc.

    Everything was vastly overpriced for what was presented: eg. $19
    sandwiches with $8 upgrades from fries to side salads.

    Red Lobster is equally good at two thirds the price.

    Food 6/10, tacky fake theme, decor and ambiance -1, value -2, so
    3/10 overall. Avoid.

    Non sequitur:

    A beautiful woman walks into a bar. The barkeep asks, "What'll you
    have?" She replies, "I'd like a double entendre, please." So he
    gives it to her."

    Cheers

    Jim

    ... It was all foam and no beer.

    ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)