• 557 syrup was notes was

    From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Sunday, April 08, 2018 20:30:59
    Hi Michael,

    flavors in it that are distracting to me; also
    a woody bitterness, though the other ingredients
    might smooth that out.
    Depends on what the other ingredients are. Some might work; others, might better use a somewhat lighter syrup.

    If there's a substantial amount of extra-dark syrup
    in anything, it would be detectable by most. In a
    few cases it might even enhance the dish.

    As long as you don't use so much that it overpowers other tastes.

    the Canadian and US federal governments, and
    all maple syrup sold to the public is Grade A
    by fiat.
    Somebody needs to straighten them out, not every beef is
    Grade A nor > ML> is > all syrup.
    That's the thing - they've redefined grade A as
    something else than a quality designation but
    are counting on the public not to know that.
    Not a good practice, IMO

    I didn't think so, either.

    Guess they think the average consumer is too dumb to know the
    difference.


    Sometimes, but not always, one and the same--maple growers
    and syrup > ML> > producers/packers.
    There are the small farms, sure, but even
    such a traditionally made product has felt
    the effects of massive agribusiness. Out west,
    we get all our maple syrup from Trader Joe's,
    which though a generally worthy operation, is
    hugely corporate.
    Somebody has to supply TJ's with the syrup. It's not as if a big corporation can crank it out on an assembly line like a box of
    cereal. > TJ's must have contracts with a number of suppliers who,
    instead of
    putting their own label on the product, put a TJ's label on instead.

    It's agribiz that supplies TJ's - you can't be
    imagining that thousands of little pickup trucks
    come in from Vermont and upstate and drop things
    off at the stores. Actually, not only is it agribiz
    it appears to be Canadian agribiz.

    I had the mental picture of them all sending it to a central facility
    for combining/repackaging.

    Rather odd that this calls for more regular sugar than maple,
    and > ML> almost > as much molasses as maple. Good way to drown out
    the maple > ML> flavor.
    It is a New England recipe, the implication
    being frugal. I'm sure that for that person,
    the balance of sweeteners created the best
    ratio of maple flavor to cost.
    Probably so. Could be also that the maple taste might have been a
    bit > too strong also, especially if someting like a C grade was used.

    That would be heresy for a New Englander [g]

    Probably so. As I've said, I was raised on nothing but maple syrup and
    consider anything like Mrs. Butterworth's (or similar) to be a very poor imitation of the real thing.

    Fruit and Nut Granola
    I used to make our granola type cereal all the time. Got away from
    it > when Steve joined the Army and some of the ingredients were
    harder to > find. I've done it off and on over the years but not on a regular basis > like I used to.

    Especially with the diabetic issue that
    intervened. Granola is - despite its reputation
    - not very good for anyone.

    Depends on what goes into it. Ours had a minimal amount of sweetening,
    usually honey. Also had roasted soy beans, oatmeal, wheat germ......

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)