It's a recurring theme in art and literatureDunno.... sometimes truth truly is stranger than fiction... fiction has
- I guess you'd say "lore"; whether that has
anything to do with reality, maybe some scholars
know, but the truth is probably less interesting
than the fiction so doesn't get publicized..
to be at least somewhat believable... truth is what it is... :)
They were amusing and tuneful and well crafted,Exactly. Sometimes there was at least a hint of it, though...
but they didn't sound anything like the works of
the composers whose names they bore or even of
the period they were supposed to have come from.
manuscript collection contained only one pieceApparently... and then incensed when it did come out... He was right
each by a whole lot of unrelated composers. And
only a Sicilienne and no other associated pieces
by Francoeur ,,, a Sicilienne wasn't a standalone
piece (not until the Romantic period, anyway).
I guess the public was in the right mood to be
duped at that particular moment.
about one thing, the works would be better received if attributed to
other, established, composers than if he put them out as his own... even though they did have sufficient merit on their own...
Oh, ok... undoubtedly... ;)Guys & Dolls is a pretty old show and no doubt informedProbably... :)
that, which I'm guessing is 1776, despite its name a
quite younger show?
Undoubtedly, you mean?
Well, my observation is that there is a sortAt one time, that was a real limitation of some bbs systems, as well as
of 200 limit, but I like to keep things
under 150. The old rules discouraged anything
over 100
some offline readers, to not be able to deal with any message more than
100 lines... but that's not the case any more... just some offline
readers that still do the breaking of messages to accomodate that....
and had the seemingly quixotic limitAlso keeps things from getting too complicated... :)
of one recipe or at most two very short ones,
which is fine with me as it had the side effect
of keeping things on- but not too on-topic.
Some of the readers may not believe it, but:)
I'm not treating you all like babies except
when you are.
... Sorry, my taglines are in a box somewhere.
It's a recurring theme in art and literatureDunno.... sometimes truth truly is stranger than fiction... fiction has
- I guess you'd say "lore"; whether that has
anything to do with reality, maybe some scholars
know, but the truth is probably less interesting
than the fiction so doesn't get publicized..
to be at least somewhat believable... truth is what it is... :)
They were amusing and tuneful and well crafted,Exactly. Sometimes there was at least a hint of it, though...
but they didn't sound anything like the works of
the composers whose names they bore or even of
the period they were supposed to have come from.
manuscript collection contained only one pieceApparently... and then incensed when it did come out... He was right
each by a whole lot of unrelated composers. And
only a Sicilienne and no other associated pieces
by Francoeur ,,, a Sicilienne wasn't a standalone
piece (not until the Romantic period, anyway).
I guess the public was in the right mood to be
duped at that particular moment.
about one thing, the works would be better received if attributed to
other, established, composers than if he put them out as his own... even though they did have sufficient merit on their own...
Oh, ok... undoubtedly... ;)Guys & Dolls is a pretty old show and no doubt informedProbably... :)
that, which I'm guessing is 1776, despite its name a
quite younger show?
Undoubtedly, you mean?
Well, my observation is that there is a sortAt one time, that was a real limitation of some bbs systems, as well as
of 200 limit, but I like to keep things
under 150. The old rules discouraged anything
over 100
some offline readers, to not be able to deal with any message more than
100 lines... but that's not the case any more... just some offline
readers that still do the breaking of messages to accomodate that....
and had the seemingly quixotic limitAlso keeps things from getting too complicated... :)
of one recipe or at most two very short ones,
which is fine with me as it had the side effect
of keeping things on- but not too on-topic.
Some of the readers may not believe it, but:)
I'm not treating you all like babies except
when you are.
... Sorry, my taglines are in a box somewhere.
Quoting Michael Loo to Nancy Backus on 06-05-19 08:46 <=-
It's a recurring theme in art and literatureDunno.... sometimes truth truly is stranger than fiction... fiction has
- I guess you'd say "lore"; whether that has
anything to do with reality, maybe some scholars
know, but the truth is probably less interesting
than the fiction so doesn't get publicized..
to be at least somewhat believable... truth is what it is... :)
True - some amazing real events are too improbable-
sounding to sell copy or views.
They were amusing and tuneful and well crafted,Exactly. Sometimes there was at least a hint of it, though...
but they didn't sound anything like the works of
the composers whose names they bore or even of
the period they were supposed to have come from.
Kreisler messed with the heads of his naysayers
by including real pieces by Gluck and Mozart in
the mix.
manuscript collection contained only one pieceApparently... and then incensed when it did come out... He was right
each by a whole lot of unrelated composers. And
only a Sicilienne and no other associated pieces
by Francoeur ,,, a Sicilienne wasn't a standalone
piece (not until the Romantic period, anyway).
I guess the public was in the right mood to be
duped at that particular moment.
about one thing, the works would be better received if attributed to
other, established, composers than if he put them out as his own... even though they did have sufficient merit on their own...
He wasn't famous when he pulled the stunt. It
might have been to sell his pieces or a ploy
to sell himself.
Well, my observation is that there is a sortAt one time, that was a real limitation of some bbs systems, as well as
of 200 limit, but I like to keep things
under 150. The old rules discouraged anything
over 100
some offline readers, to not be able to deal with any message more than
100 lines... but that's not the case any more... just some offline
readers that still do the breaking of messages to accomodate that....
I once appended my entire primary recipe file, some
20000 lines, to an echo message. It went through
some places and not others; to my knowledge it
didn't break anything too seriously.
and had the seemingly quixotic limitAlso keeps things from getting too complicated... :)
of one recipe or at most two very short ones,
which is fine with me as it had the side effect
of keeping things on- but not too on-topic.
Yep. I'm sticking with a semi-enforced 100-line
preference and 200-line de facto limit.
... Sorry, my taglines are in a box somewhere.
No, they're not.
On its flight manifests, United used to have
these designations (not for public eyes) -
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$&
$full fare first class$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$&
or
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$&&
$Premier 100K flier$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 107:28:09 |
Calls: | 2,157 |
Files: | 11,149 |
Messages: | 951,622 |