Hi all!
I was wondering if there was a way to download a QWK and upload a REP packet from the localqwk directory from the mystic/mystic.exe command
line without having to log into the system?
I was wondering if there was a way to download a QWK and upload a REP packet from the localqwk directory from the mystic/mystic.exe command
line without having to log into the system?
Hi all!
I was wondering if there was a way to download a QWK and upload a REP packet from the localqwk directory from the mystic/mystic.exe command
line without having to log into the system?
IB JOE wrote to Warp 4 <=-
On 11/23/17, robert wolfe said the following...
Hi all!
I was wondering if there was a way to download a QWK and upload a REP packet from the localqwk directory from the mystic/mystic.exe command
line without having to log into the system?
Can I ask why?? What is your goal??
:)
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/11/22 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (1:129/215)
This coming out for the Pi as well anytime soon?
Yes. But the BBS must be running FTP from MIS. All you have to do is
use FTP and log in with your BBS ID. The get the qwk file. Do the reverse to upload the rep file.
Can I ask why?? What is your goal??
:)
Um, maybe to speed things up when downloading my own QWK packets and
using an offline mail reader to read and reply offline on the same
machine the BBS runs on as I am doing now perhaps?
IB JOE wrote to Warp 4 <=-
Can I ask why?? What is your goal??
:)
Um, maybe to speed things up when downloading my own QWK packets and
using an offline mail reader to read and reply offline on the same
machine the BBS runs on as I am doing now perhaps?
Cuz, GoldEd is cool... Mystic has JAM as a message base... golded reads that just fine... no need to logon or off...
g00r00 wrote to Warp 4 <=-
I was wondering if there was a way to download a QWK and upload a REP packet from the localqwk directory from the mystic/mystic.exe command line without having to log into the system?
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A36 2017/11/22 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (1:129/215)
This coming out for the Pi as well anytime soon?
Yes here is the link:
I'm not exactly sure that link was supposed to be made publicly
This coming out for the Pi as well anytime soon?
Yes here is the link:
You should be made aware that this version is for Alpha Testers ONLY and should
NOT be used in any production environments per the author. It may very
On 11/27/17, Nicholas Boel pondered and said...
Yes here is the link:
I'm not exactly sure that link was supposed to be made publicly
Agreed... can you just check with g00r00 first please Christopher next time before you do...
This coming out for the Pi as well anytime soon?Yes here is the link:
http://www.mysticbbs.com/downloads/prealpha/
* An ongoing debate between Christopher Malo and robert wolfe rages on
...
You should be made aware that this version is for Alpha Testers ONLY and should
NOT be used in any production environments per the author. It may very well eat
your lunch!!! lol (One ate mine once)
Really, I'm a tester and am waiting for the actual Alpha release before
I install it here. Of course, I do actual production testing myself :-) Note G00R00's Alphas are closer to a Beta in the real world {chuckle}, though FWIW, as a PRE-Alpha you're getting an actual/true Alpha install
by any means ...
You should be made aware that this version is for Alpha Testers
ONLY and should NOT be used in any production environments per
the author. It may very
People can install it if they want, just know that some of these daily builds have been pretty problematic in the past week or two. Lots of changes going on behind the scenes...
On 11/27/17, Nicholas Boel pondered and said...
Yes here is the link:
I'm not exactly sure that link was supposed to be made publicly
Agreed... can you just check with g00r00 first please Christopher next time before you do...
Hello Christopher,
On Mon Nov 27 2017 03:44:30, Christopher Malo wrote to robert wolfe:
This coming out for the Pi as well anytime soon?
Yes here is the link:
I'm not exactly sure that link was supposed to be made publicly
available.
On 11/28/17, Christopher Malo pondered and said...
The address was already made public by g00r00 so I do not see the iss
Oh OK... I was not aware it had been here. All good.
The address was already made public by g00r00 so I do not see the issue.
Just reflecting on this further. I think the point both Nick and I
were attempting to make was that the address had not been made public
in this echo. I agree a number (yourself included) are well aware of
it but the existence of it was never shared here but in an othernet.
In any regard it's all good as g00r00 has commented he's relaxed about
it but my initial thought when I saw your original post was similar to Nicks.. should this be disclosed by someone other than the author? I
tend to defer to the author to share such things as/when he wants to
in case there may have been concerns over version controls etc.
Was it that easy to get my point? Oh wait, you had the same one. ;)
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 28 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 146:55:00 |
| Calls: | 2,001 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,112 |
| Messages: | 943,406 |