Hello,
I run a Synchronet system with a heavily modified web interface. To do
this I've had to change some of the .ssjs files to match the interface.
What I found was that it seems all the files honor the setting of whether
or not to display topnav/leftnav etc., but reply.ssjs does not. It just displays them.
I've modified my copy for my needs, but didn't know if this is
intentional, or an oversight (or maybe I have no idea what I'm doing,
which is always an option). Thought I'd mention it. Clips from the files
are below.
reply.ssjs:
write_template("header.inc");
load(topnav_html);
load(leftnav_html);
other .ssjs files:
if(do_header)
write_template("header.inc");
if(do_topnav)
load(topnav_html);
if(do_leftnav)
load(leftnav_html);
if(do_rightnav)
write_template("rightnav.inc");
I'm running 3.17, Rev A - Feb 20, 2018
Re: reply.ssjs vs other .ssjs files
By: Retro Guy to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Wed Aug 15 2018 10:23 am
Hello,
I run a Synchronet system with a heavily modified web interface. To do this I've had to change some of the .ssjs files to match the interface.
What I found was that it seems all the files honor the setting of whether or not to display topnav/leftnav etc., but reply.ssjs does not. It just displays them.
I've modified my copy for my needs, but didn't know if this is intentional, or an oversight (or maybe I have no idea what I'm doing, which is always an option). Thought I'd mention it. Clips from the files are below.
Cool. If you want to send me the fixed reply.ssjs I'll check it into CVS for others to use.
digital man
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 28 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 189:51:38 |
Calls: | 2,004 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,114 |
Messages: | 942,281 |