• danger, Will Robinson, danger...lucid dreaming will drive you insane

    From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:28:45
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    http://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/why-our-brain-needs-sleep-and-what-happens-if-we-dont-get-enough-of-it-20171018-gz3s0s.html

    This article summarises current knowledge regarding sleep function
    relevance to memory, mental health etc.

    "Sleep serves many different functions. One of these is to help us
    remember experiences we had during the day. REM sleep is thought to be important for emotional memories (for example, memories involving
    fear) or procedural memory (such as how to ride a bike). On the other
    hand, slow-wave sleep is thought to reflect the storing of so-called "declarative" memories that are the conscious record of your
    experiences and what you know (for example, what you had for
    breakfast)."

    "We also know experiences are "replayed" in the brain during sleep -
    the memories of these experiences are like segments from a movie that
    can be rewound and played forward again. .... Replay helps to
    strengthen the connections between brain cells, and is therefore
    thought to be important for consolidating memories."

    Therefore:

    REM = emotional and procedural memories
    Slow wave = declarative memories
    Replay = consolidating memories

    In lucid dreaming, none of the above occurs because interaction by the
    dreamer creates new things, things which are not historic - they are
    not memories.

    Therefore, it is at least possible, if not plausible, that functions
    related to mental health and survival which have evolved over
    millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of years, are being moderated, mitigated and tampered with by lucid dreaming. While lucid dreaming,
    memories are not being consolidated, they are not beiong pruned, they
    are not being replayed. It is therefore plausible that significant
    and frequent lucid dreaming damages memories and damages mental health
    and is contrary to survival.

    Logic.



    “There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

    Leonard Cohen

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:09:32
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:28:45 +0100, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:


    http://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/why-our-brain-needs-sleep-and-what-happens-if-we-dont-get-enough-of-it-20171018-gz3s0s.html

    This article summarises current knowledge regarding sleep function
    relevance to memory, mental health etc.

    "Sleep serves many different functions. One of these is to help us
    remember experiences we had during the day. REM sleep is thought to be important for emotional memories (for example, memories involving
    fear) or procedural memory (such as how to ride a bike). On the other
    hand, slow-wave sleep is thought to reflect the storing of so-called "declarative" memories that are the conscious record of your
    experiences and what you know (for example, what you had for
    breakfast)."

    "We also know experiences are "replayed" in the brain during sleep -
    the memories of these experiences are like segments from a movie that
    can be rewound and played forward again. .... Replay helps to
    strengthen the connections between brain cells, and is therefore
    thought to be important for consolidating memories."

    Therefore:

    REM = emotional and procedural memories
    Slow wave = declarative memories
    Replay = consolidating memories

    In lucid dreaming, none of the above occurs because interaction by the dreamer creates new things, things which are not historic - they are
    not memories.

    Therefore, it is at least possible, if not plausible, that functions
    related to mental health and survival which have evolved over
    millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of years, are being moderated, mitigated and tampered with by lucid dreaming. While lucid dreaming, memories are not being consolidated, they are not beiong pruned, they
    are not being replayed. It is therefore plausible that significant
    and frequent lucid dreaming damages memories and damages mental health
    and is contrary to survival.

    Logic.

    ### - yeah, well, THAT then must be WHY the tibetan buddists are THE most INSANE peeps on planet earth!? huh...

    riiiight... ;)


    “There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

    ### - perhaps 'lucid' dreaming is the "crack" in the rationalists
    otherwise 'fixed beliefs' (beliefs because they don't 'actually' know...) regarding sleep & dreaming heh...

    :D

    (Ps. so, does your above pile of secondhand 'asserted baloney' represent
    your personal comment on my book/theory then? really?? then ya might wanna
    try some 'independent' thinking on matters occasionally thang, instead of always indulging 100% in lazy rote, inherited... belief)

    :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 18:36:45
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:09:32 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:28:45 +0100, thang ornerythinchus ><thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:


    http://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/why-our-brain-needs-sleep-and-what-happens-if-we-dont-get-enough-of-it-20171018-gz3s0s.html

    This article summarises current knowledge regarding sleep function
    relevance to memory, mental health etc.

    "Sleep serves many different functions. One of these is to help us
    remember experiences we had during the day. REM sleep is thought to be
    important for emotional memories (for example, memories involving
    fear) or procedural memory (such as how to ride a bike). On the other
    hand, slow-wave sleep is thought to reflect the storing of so-called
    "declarative" memories that are the conscious record of your
    experiences and what you know (for example, what you had for
    breakfast)."

    "We also know experiences are "replayed" in the brain during sleep -
    the memories of these experiences are like segments from a movie that
    can be rewound and played forward again. .... Replay helps to
    strengthen the connections between brain cells, and is therefore
    thought to be important for consolidating memories."

    Therefore:

    REM = emotional and procedural memories
    Slow wave = declarative memories
    Replay = consolidating memories

    In lucid dreaming, none of the above occurs because interaction by the
    dreamer creates new things, things which are not historic - they are
    not memories.

    Therefore, it is at least possible, if not plausible, that functions
    related to mental health and survival which have evolved over
    millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of years, are being moderated,
    mitigated and tampered with by lucid dreaming. While lucid dreaming,
    memories are not being consolidated, they are not beiong pruned, they
    are not being replayed. It is therefore plausible that significant
    and frequent lucid dreaming damages memories and damages mental health
    and is contrary to survival.

    Logic.

    ### - yeah, well, THAT then must be WHY the tibetan buddists are THE most >INSANE peeps on planet earth!? huh...

    riiiight... ;)


    “There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

    ### - perhaps 'lucid' dreaming is the "crack" in the rationalists
    otherwise 'fixed beliefs' (beliefs because they don't 'actually' know...) >regarding sleep & dreaming heh...

    :D

    (Ps. so, does your above pile of secondhand 'asserted baloney' represent
    your personal comment on my book/theory then? really?? then ya might wanna >try some 'independent' thinking on matters occasionally thang, instead of >always indulging 100% in lazy rote, inherited... belief)

    Hey you can't just reject medical science. Your liver is a chemical
    factory which can be poisoned by alcohol - you believe that right? Or
    your lungs are a gas exchange and filter which can be clogged by
    tobacco? Right?

    Well the brain is more subtle, it's workings can't really be measured
    by volume or pressure, but what comes out of it are pyramids, moon
    landings, computers, the Mona Lisa and so on. You believe that right?
    So being the most complex organ in the body it needs the most complex
    care and attention right? With me so far?

    Sooooo, if dreaming is mainly about sorting, pruning, consolidating
    memories so we can use the important ones to maximise survival- then
    surely if our dreams aren't historic, memory based - what can go
    wrong?

    You are extremely obstinate. Hugely, greatly dogmatic. You're not
    open minded at all. That is a major impediment. You could for
    instance actually think about things, pull apart an argument and
    counter-argue like a normal reasonable person in a civilised way.
    Nope. It's your way or the highway.

    Try a bit of flexibility. We're not playing for cattle stations here,
    it's just a slow old remnant of a group with some dodgy old timers in
    it basically waiting to see who dies first. So don't be so dogmatic -
    you're always railing against the suit wearing public and the
    intelligentsia but you're just as bad. Stubborn views are what have
    got us all into this mess but very few see that.






    :)

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:54:09
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    LD doesn't drive you insane, unless you obsess on it or develop
    delusional beliefs about it that affect your daily world in
    negative ways. Like many other kinds of 'altered consciousness'
    it's interesting, exciting, and somewhat beneficial in moderation.

    It's not any kind of 'revolution', though. And if someone tried
    to totally 'replace sleep' with LD as Slider has occasionally
    speculated might be possible, that could be very bad for them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to david.j.worrell@gmail.com on Thursday, October 19, 2017 20:03:52
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:54:09 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> wrote:

    LD doesn't drive you insane, unless you obsess on it or develop
    delusional beliefs about it that affect your daily world in
    negative ways. Like many other kinds of 'altered consciousness'
    it's interesting, exciting, and somewhat beneficial in moderation.

    It's not any kind of 'revolution', though. And if someone tried
    to totally 'replace sleep' with LD as Slider has occasionally
    speculated might be possible, that could be very bad for them.

    ### - you don't know SHIT about it jeremy! you only 'pretend' you do :)

    i.e., WILDing ain't necessarily lucid dreaming! (we don't know WHAT it
    is!) the term 'lucid dreaming' being derived solely from DILDs & DILDing! WILDing wasn't even taken into consideration?! - big mistake on laberge's
    part! - HUGE!

    WILDing ultimately could/might even replace... SLEEP!

    these are the implications you're ignoring/too scared to consider!

    that, or you're just unable to read/model properly heh, which IS actually
    MORE than likely :)

    the end of 'sleep' as we know it WOULD be a revolution! although that's a
    long way off...

    whereas WILDing IS actually a revolution in lucid dreaming as it's
    currently known!

    you need to 'butt-out' of things you're admittedly not even interested in jeremy :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Thursday, October 19, 2017 19:47:34
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:36:45 +0100, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:09:32 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:28:45 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:


    http://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellbeing/why-our-brain-needs-sleep-and-what-happens-if-we-dont-get-enough-of-it-20171018-gz3s0s.html

    This article summarises current knowledge regarding sleep function
    relevance to memory, mental health etc.

    "Sleep serves many different functions. One of these is to help us
    remember experiences we had during the day. REM sleep is thought to be
    important for emotional memories (for example, memories involving
    fear) or procedural memory (such as how to ride a bike). On the other
    hand, slow-wave sleep is thought to reflect the storing of so-called
    "declarative" memories that are the conscious record of your
    experiences and what you know (for example, what you had for
    breakfast)."

    "We also know experiences are "replayed" in the brain during sleep -
    the memories of these experiences are like segments from a movie that
    can be rewound and played forward again. .... Replay helps to
    strengthen the connections between brain cells, and is therefore
    thought to be important for consolidating memories."

    Therefore:

    REM = emotional and procedural memories
    Slow wave = declarative memories
    Replay = consolidating memories

    In lucid dreaming, none of the above occurs because interaction by the
    dreamer creates new things, things which are not historic - they are
    not memories.

    Therefore, it is at least possible, if not plausible, that functions
    related to mental health and survival which have evolved over
    millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of years, are being moderated,
    mitigated and tampered with by lucid dreaming. While lucid dreaming,
    memories are not being consolidated, they are not beiong pruned, they
    are not being replayed. It is therefore plausible that significant
    and frequent lucid dreaming damages memories and damages mental health
    and is contrary to survival.

    Logic.

    ### - yeah, well, THAT then must be WHY the tibetan buddists are THE
    most
    INSANE peeps on planet earth!? huh...

    riiiight... ;)


    “There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

    ### - perhaps 'lucid' dreaming is the "crack" in the rationalists
    otherwise 'fixed beliefs' (beliefs because they don't 'actually'
    know...)
    regarding sleep & dreaming heh...

    :D

    (Ps. so, does your above pile of secondhand 'asserted baloney' represent
    your personal comment on my book/theory then? really?? then ya might
    wanna
    try some 'independent' thinking on matters occasionally thang, instead
    of
    always indulging 100% in lazy rote, inherited... belief)

    Hey you can't just reject medical science. Your liver is a chemical
    factory which can be poisoned by alcohol - you believe that right? Or
    your lungs are a gas exchange and filter which can be clogged by
    tobacco? Right?

    ### - medical science admits NOT knowing very much about sleep & sleeping,
    let alone dreaming, yet often asserts it knows everything in a convincing-enough manner in order to paper-over the cracks in its, quite
    often, dismissive/crackpot theories... it will even tell 'lies', when in
    the employ of certain organisations, to deliberately mislead the public
    for financial purposes (e.g., such as blaming/scapegoating cigarette
    smoking for decades for certain illnesses instead of pointing out the true causes of them; such as lead and particulate pollution from burning oil derivatives used in cars...) you need to be more objective/unbiased sport
    :)



    Well the brain is more subtle, it's workings can't really be measured
    by volume or pressure, but what comes out of it are pyramids, moon
    landings, computers, the Mona Lisa and so on. You believe that right?
    So being the most complex organ in the body it needs the most complex
    care and attention right? With me so far?

    ### - i don't 'believe' anything! i can 'accept' certain things but that doesn't imply i 'believe' them (am not religious, i have no faith...) the
    brain too is very little understood as yet + what isn't known is assumed
    unless proven otherwise... and as for the 'mind' in man; they have no
    idea/clue whatsoever concerning just 'how' it arises other than assuming
    it arises 'in' the brain...


    Sooooo, if dreaming is mainly about sorting, pruning, consolidating
    memories so we can use the important ones to maximise survival- then
    surely if our dreams aren't historic, memory based - what can go
    wrong?

    ### - yeah that's a big *IF* - plus we sleep and we dream and the process
    is very little understood as yet (am thinking 'out' of the box here while
    you merely reiterate old, unproven dogma on the subject... duh)

    ALL the above (of yours regarding dreaming) is unproven, mere assumption,
    the only thing they know for 'sure' being that we go nuts if/when
    un-allowed to dream (dream deprivation as opposed to sleep deprivation; we
    can go without sleep but not dreaming?!) + current reasoning doesn't even 'allow' for 'lucid' dreaming let alone WILDing to occur, so there's
    obviously something wrong with that/more to be discovered... yet you
    discount it out of hand?? - moron alert! ;)



    You are extremely obstinate. Hugely, greatly dogmatic. You're not
    open minded at all. That is a major impediment. You could for
    instance actually think about things, pull apart an argument and counter-argue like a normal reasonable person in a civilised way.
    Nope. It's your way or the highway.

    ### - so, like every other 'unthinking' dogma-loving moron on the planet,
    you ridicule what you don't (or can't) understand?? fyi a theory is merely
    a theory (a model) until proven either right or wrong, and my model (of dreaming) is no different... you ridiculing it because you don't like the 'sound' of it (because it goes against convention) is completely
    unreasonable and unintelligent, in galileo's day, for instance, you would
    have been defending the older model of the sun orbiting the earth... and
    look how wrong 'that' turned out to be lol (180 degrees wrong! look behind you!)

    and because in truth; you present no 'argument' here and/or are merely
    being evasive, thus you should try to be braver, more specific...
    courageous rather than cowardly? - take a fucking chance occasionally man!
    stop being soooo scared of sometimes being wrong! (lol...)

    :)



    Try a bit of flexibility. We're not playing for cattle stations here,
    it's just a slow old remnant of a group with some dodgy old timers in
    it basically waiting to see who dies first. So don't be so dogmatic -
    you're always railing against the suit wearing public and the
    intelligentsia but you're just as bad. Stubborn views are what have
    got us all into this mess but very few see that.

    ### - heh, "trying a little flexibility" in your thinking is precisely
    what i (in my book) was asking YOU to do! - to 'use' your imagination occasionally instead of letting others do all your thinking for you...

    but you prefer to be evasive/cowardly instead, sticking with the known
    even when they don't really know??

    duh...

    get back to me sport when you can start thinking for 'yourself'
    occasionally :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From whisperoutloud@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 12:54:57
    From: allreadydun@gmail.com

    well it's nice to see we all are getting
    along so well again. My way, no my way,
    no my way, fuck you my way or the hiway!
    the real housewives of dreamtown.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Friday, October 20, 2017 00:12:49
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    well it's nice to see we all are getting
    along so well again. My way, no my way,
    no my way, fuck you my way or the hiway!
    the real housewives of dreamtown.

    ### - you too bitch! (j/k) hehehe :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From whisperoutloud@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 17:55:28
    From: allreadydun@gmail.com

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCDZzf4ragg

    i figure we all could use a lift.
    sometimes the shit comes fast and quick
    we forget that we are still standing...
    we ain't dead yet..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to allreadydun@gmail.com on Friday, October 20, 2017 10:17:40
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:55:28 -0700 (PDT), whisperoutloud <allreadydun@gmail.com> wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCDZzf4ragg

    i figure we all could use a lift.
    sometimes the shit comes fast and quick
    we forget that we are still standing...
    we ain't dead yet..

    We sure ain't that's for shure...


    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to slider on Thursday, October 19, 2017 19:32:19
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 12:04:00 PM UTC-7, slider wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:54:09 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan
    wrote:

    LD doesn't drive you insane, unless you obsess on it or develop
    delusional beliefs about it that affect your daily world in
    negative ways. Like many other kinds of 'altered consciousness'
    it's interesting, exciting, and somewhat beneficial in moderation.

    It's not any kind of 'revolution', though. And if someone tried
    to totally 'replace sleep' with LD as Slider has occasionally
    speculated might be possible, that could be very bad for them.

    ### - you don't know SHIT about it jeremy! you only 'pretend' you do :)

    Apparently you don't know anything about it either, Slider.

    For all of your endless blathering and arguing about it,
    you have not ever described a single characteristic of WILD
    that allegedly significantly differentiates it from DILD.
    And I think that's because you can't.

    The only credible research I've ever seen that differentiates
    WILD from DILD in any major way at all has found tentatively that
    more so-called OBE's and experiences of flying seem to result
    from WILD than from DILD

    But since I've had many, many seeming "OBE's" (which really aren't)
    and many, many experiences of lucid flight, I really don't think
    I've missed out on anything.

    I've also been careful to observe, from my own experiences,
    how if there is another characteristic that differentiates WILD,
    it is possibly the tendency to dream an exact copy of one's real-time environment which seems so realistic that one can easily believe
    oneself to be awake or "OBE". If there's any real experiential
    differentiator of WILD, I'd say that's probably it.

    And I also know beyond a shadow of a doubt that full lucidity
    is attainable in both DILD and WILD.

    But you have never described any significant difference between
    the experience of DILD and WILD - at least, not any difference
    other those that can be explained by your own relative inability
    to maintain full lucidity in DILD.


    i.e., WILDing ain't necessarily lucid dreaming! (we don't know WHAT it
    is!) the term 'lucid dreaming' being derived solely from DILDs & DILDing! WILDing wasn't even taken into consideration?! - big mistake on laberge's part! - HUGE!

    LaBerge is one of the few people who ever did serious research on WILD.
    He's the one who found a higher incidence of seeming "OBE" and flying
    in WILDs. Show me any better research on WILD than LaBerge's.

    I'm not saying his is great; I'm just saying there isn't much.


    WILDing ultimately could/might even replace... SLEEP!

    Could? Might? Just more cheap talk and fanaticism.


    these are the implications you're ignoring/too scared to consider!

    No, I simply think your ideas on this are dead wrong. You ignore
    the voluminous research on the multiple functions of sleep.
    (Just as you studiously ignore any evidence on any subject that
    differs from your own stubbornly fixed opinions.)


    that, or you're just unable to read/model properly heh, which IS actually MORE than likely :)

    Yeah, toss out some more smoke and bs. Pathetic. :)


    the end of 'sleep' as we know it WOULD be a revolution! although that's a long way off...

    whereas WILDing IS actually a revolution in lucid dreaming as it's
    currently known!

    In what way? You never say, and can't say, because you don't know.
    You just keep making "WILD" claims you can't back up. :)


    you need to 'butt-out' of things you're admittedly not even interested in jeremy :)

    You're the one who pretends to know what he's talking about. In reality,
    you seem to know nothing more about LD than I do, and maybe less. :)

    I'll tell you this much. You've never spoken of any LD *experience*
    that seemed very interesting or impressive to me. Shit, even my
    ordinary dreams are often more interesting than any dreaming
    experience I've ever seen you post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to david.j.worrell@gmail.com on Friday, October 20, 2017 06:39:35
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    ### - yadda yadda yadda jeremy... i have no interest whatever in your
    35-year old 'memories' of dreaming to which you keep desperately
    referring... plus despite your bleatings & complaints to the contrary; am
    NOT interested in discussing 'anything' with someone who's mind is not
    only completely closed to progress in the matter of dreaming, but who is
    also firmly rooted in a distant past from which you cannot & will not
    willingly escape/leave behind!?

    am FAR MORE interested, for instance, in chris's impromptu experience of
    just the other day, in (and from) which it is probably now slowly dawning
    on him that he HAS in fact an unrealised 'psychic ability' to be easily
    ABLE to project his full conscious awareness 'directly' into an altered
    state of awareness (currently called/considered-to-be a dream state)
    'without' having to first fall asleep OR even take drugs in order to do so!

    and which is, afaic, something you 'quite obviously' know absolutely
    'nothing' about, nada!

    i.e., HE at least HAS a 'genuine' + RECENT experience to refer to!

    what have YOU gots? that is apart from just some 35-year old (likely
    impaired) 'memories' + a 'whole bunch' of whining complaints & criticisms 'because' you're no longer involved?? hah!

    i mean, who CARES what YOU think!

    you're just 'has-been' history that got... left behind!

    (ouch!) :D




    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:32:19 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 12:04:00 PM UTC-7, slider wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:54:09 +0100, Jeremy H. Denisovan
    wrote:

    LD doesn't drive you insane, unless you obsess on it or develop
    delusional beliefs about it that affect your daily world in
    negative ways. Like many other kinds of 'altered consciousness'
    it's interesting, exciting, and somewhat beneficial in moderation.

    It's not any kind of 'revolution', though. And if someone tried
    to totally 'replace sleep' with LD as Slider has occasionally
    speculated might be possible, that could be very bad for them.

    ### - you don't know SHIT about it jeremy! you only 'pretend' you do :)

    Apparently you don't know anything about it either, Slider.

    For all of your endless blathering and arguing about it,
    you have not ever described a single characteristic of WILD
    that allegedly significantly differentiates it from DILD.
    And I think that's because you can't.

    The only credible research I've ever seen that differentiates
    WILD from DILD in any major way at all has found tentatively that
    more so-called OBE's and experiences of flying seem to result
    from WILD than from DILD

    But since I've had many, many seeming "OBE's" (which really aren't)
    and many, many experiences of lucid flight, I really don't think
    I've missed out on anything.

    I've also been careful to observe, from my own experiences,
    how if there is another characteristic that differentiates WILD,
    it is possibly the tendency to dream an exact copy of one's real-time environment which seems so realistic that one can easily believe
    oneself to be awake or "OBE". If there's any real experiential
    differentiator of WILD, I'd say that's probably it.

    And I also know beyond a shadow of a doubt that full lucidity
    is attainable in both DILD and WILD.

    But you have never described any significant difference between
    the experience of DILD and WILD - at least, not any difference
    other those that can be explained by your own relative inability
    to maintain full lucidity in DILD.


    i.e., WILDing ain't necessarily lucid dreaming! (we don't know WHAT it
    is!) the term 'lucid dreaming' being derived solely from DILDs &
    DILDing!
    WILDing wasn't even taken into consideration?! - big mistake on
    laberge's
    part! - HUGE!

    LaBerge is one of the few people who ever did serious research on WILD.
    He's the one who found a higher incidence of seeming "OBE" and flying
    in WILDs. Show me any better research on WILD than LaBerge's.

    I'm not saying his is great; I'm just saying there isn't much.


    WILDing ultimately could/might even replace... SLEEP!

    Could? Might? Just more cheap talk and fanaticism.


    these are the implications you're ignoring/too scared to consider!

    No, I simply think your ideas on this are dead wrong. You ignore
    the voluminous research on the multiple functions of sleep.
    (Just as you studiously ignore any evidence on any subject that
    differs from your own stubbornly fixed opinions.)


    that, or you're just unable to read/model properly heh, which IS
    actually
    MORE than likely :)

    Yeah, toss out some more smoke and bs. Pathetic. :)


    the end of 'sleep' as we know it WOULD be a revolution! although that's
    a
    long way off...

    whereas WILDing IS actually a revolution in lucid dreaming as it's
    currently known!

    In what way? You never say, and can't say, because you don't know.
    You just keep making "WILD" claims you can't back up. :)


    you need to 'butt-out' of things you're admittedly not even interested
    in
    jeremy :)

    You're the one who pretends to know what he's talking about. In reality,
    you seem to know nothing more about LD than I do, and maybe less. :)

    I'll tell you this much. You've never spoken of any LD *experience*
    that seemed very interesting or impressive to me. Shit, even my
    ordinary dreams are often more interesting than any dreaming
    experience I've ever seen you post.



    --
    Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Donovan@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, October 19, 2017 23:16:22
    From: jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com

    The friggin' ordinary dream I had just
    last night was more fascinating than
    any dream I've seen you post in 15 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to allreadydun@gmail.com on Friday, October 20, 2017 10:19:41
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:54:57 -0700 (PDT), whisperoutloud <allreadydun@gmail.com> wrote:

    well it's nice to see we all are getting
    along so well again. My way, no my way,
    no my way, fuck you my way or the hiway!
    the real housewives of dreamtown.

    Where's the fun in getting along? After 3.5 billion years of
    evolution based on adaptation and survival of the fittest, all of a
    sudden we need to "get along"?? How the fuck are we going to evolve
    into the next species?

    Dreamer, awake...



    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Friday, October 20, 2017 11:55:39
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    some nowhere man wrote...

    The friggin' ordinary dream I had just
    last night was more fascinating than
    any dream I've seen you post in 15 years.

    ### - heh yeah, well, that's obviously because you're VERY ordinary jeremy!

    extraordinarily so!

    yawn boringly so... 'no imagination' whatsoever! and, are all too easily impressed! :)

    like: who gives a SHIT about ordinary dreams! especially YOURS?? (duh!)

    so why don'tcha just hit us up AGAIN with TRUMP news and CLIMATE change??

    after all; that's been your routinely-lame DAILY-reporting style for the
    last 18 months or more, has it not?!

    one that rather obviously involves/requires no 'actual thought' at all.

    (geeze it's like shooting 'fucks' in a barrel? too easy!)

    :D heh...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From whisperoutloud@1:229/2 to All on Friday, October 20, 2017 07:29:36
    From: allreadydun@gmail.com

    i had some very interesting dreams this
    morning (after 4:00 AM) great dreaming
    experience, some of it was lucid and some
    of it i just let it happen to see where
    it would go. i'm convinced just about
    anyone can be a sorcerer in dreams, when
    almost anything is possible it is a real
    trip. I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to whisperoutloud on Friday, October 20, 2017 21:28:18
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store world? 'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs & jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image huh...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, October 21, 2017 08:37:15
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store world? >'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists have a >nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and the >next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs & >jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.






    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Saturday, October 21, 2017 02:04:46
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular
    blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the resulting blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the
    exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 07:46:14
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus ><thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store world? >>> 'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs & >>> jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion
    extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream
    recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo >whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular
    blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the resulting >blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    While I was being a little tongue in cheek there is a core reality in
    what I said. You do waffle. It's hard to understand what you mean
    mate because you ain't no poet and you're not really very lucid
    sometimes in your ramblings.

    Just practice clear writing. It's not too hard. Idea -> draft ->
    final. Keep it short and assume your reader has a simple education.
    Punctuate, always punctuate - and observe the normal grammatical rules
    you were presumably taught in school. Practice makes perfect.

    And always read your writings after you jot them down. You *can*
    edit, you know :)


    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by >everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the >exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    Yep, Dirac was an unusual scientist. Always looking for meaning.


    A human being is a part of the whole, called by us “universe,”
    a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his
    thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest, a
    kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.

    This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our
    personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us.
    Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our
    circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole
    of nature in its beauty.

    - ALBERT EINSTEIN


    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 15:08:21
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    thang ornerythinchus wrote...

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there?
    kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and >>>> the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment;
    then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the
    thangs &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise >>>> into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion
    extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream
    recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo
    whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular
    blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the
    resulting
    blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    While I was being a little tongue in cheek there is a core reality in
    what I said. You do waffle. It's hard to understand what you mean
    mate because you ain't no poet and you're not really very lucid
    sometimes in your ramblings.

    ### - heh, i 'know' you have difficultly understanding me, and that what i
    say sometimes seems to make 'no sense' to you? (i get that reaction a lot heh...)

    truth is: YOU have to make the effort to 'make sense' of it (that's a clue
    btw) ;)



    Just practice clear writing. It's not too hard. Idea -> draft ->
    final. Keep it short and assume your reader has a simple education. Punctuate, always punctuate - and observe the normal grammatical rules
    you were presumably taught in school. Practice makes perfect.

    ### - haha, the material i've published was written in precisely that
    manner!

    that, however, is NOT the way i 'talk' in conversation (that's 'another'
    clue for ya) ;)



    And always read your writings after you jot them down. You *can*
    edit, you know :)

    ### - believe it or not i always do! meticulously! (laughing, do ya think
    it's 'easy' to write like that?? lol i have to work 'my bollocks-off' to
    write like that! haha...) :)




    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood
    by
    everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's
    the
    exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    Yep, Dirac was an unusual scientist. Always looking for meaning.

    ### - heh and here's a perfect example!; you read the FIRST part of this 'fabulous' quote but totally ignored/scooted-over the rest; the
    'important' bit?? (i.e., do you think i quoted this by random? far from
    it! it was strictly contextual and meant/intended to illuminate!)

    so now i'll set you an exercise thang, let's see if you can do it ok?
    (smile, i know you like difficult/challenging things...)

    please 'analise' the above quote of diracs' and explain, as best you can (because it's definitely going to be difficult for you, as it would be for anyone...), just 'exactly' what he's referring to when he says: "But in
    poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    the first part is clear enough AND is again, precisely how i've written my published material, but the second part of his quote in reference to
    poetry is a little more ambiguous; HOW could 'poetry' be the 'exact
    opposite'? (this is/goes deep ok?)

    after which; 'making sense' of some of the things i say may become clearer/easier to you in future ;)

    (this is not a pie-in-the-sky- exercise btw, but a genuine attempt to
    bring you just that little closer into what poetry really + actually is,
    and what it's all about... have fun)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to slider on Friday, November 17, 2017 01:08:45
    From: slider@anashram.org

    ### - here's a repost of the first mention of dirac to you dated 21/10
    last...

    it all 'started' there/here!

    and in the follow-up i went a bit farther...

    (see next repost)





    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs
    &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion
    extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream
    recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the jeremy's heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in'
    the resulting blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood
    by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's
    the exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to slider on Friday, November 17, 2017 01:22:52
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    ### - and this is the follow-up, reposted just for you ;)

    in this one (seeing as you totally ignored the last part of his quote) i challenge you to actually LOOK at it and decipher... calling your
    attention 'directly' to it...

    which you then promptly... forgot??

    (many might think in an express effort to weasel out of doing it? only i
    don't think you're a weasel, i just think it's possibly too difficult for
    you, or at least that's what YOU maybe think, only again i don't think it
    IS too hard for you, just difficult... and that you'll understand more
    when you study it and then apply 'some' of your resulting conclusions to
    my particular style of writing + that of others as regards poetry...)

    have a go can't you? it's actually very interesting! and, is potentially
    an illuminating addition to what you think you already know about poetry...

    i DID your exercise, now please do mine, and then maybe we can 'move-on'
    from our current impasse...

    imho dirac is stating something of extreme importance that shouldn't BE overlooked, but instead studied at length and in-depth until a new light
    dawns upon the subject for you personally...

    and then perhaps we can talk/discuss/debate to our little hearts-content :)




    On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:08:21 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    thang ornerythinchus wrote...

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there?
    kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever' >>>>> grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened,
    and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment;
    then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the
    thangs &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up'
    siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called >>>> "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion >>>> extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California >>>> which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It >>>> appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants >>>> has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream >>>> recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo
    whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the
    jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular
    blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the
    resulting
    blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    While I was being a little tongue in cheek there is a core reality in
    what I said. You do waffle. It's hard to understand what you mean
    mate because you ain't no poet and you're not really very lucid
    sometimes in your ramblings.

    ### - heh, i 'know' you have difficultly understanding me, and that what
    i say sometimes seems to make 'no sense' to you? (i get that reaction a
    lot heh...)

    truth is: YOU have to make the effort to 'make sense' of it (that's a
    clue btw) ;)



    Just practice clear writing. It's not too hard. Idea -> draft ->
    final. Keep it short and assume your reader has a simple education.
    Punctuate, always punctuate - and observe the normal grammatical rules
    you were presumably taught in school. Practice makes perfect.

    ### - haha, the material i've published was written in precisely that
    manner!

    that, however, is NOT the way i 'talk' in conversation (that's 'another'
    clue for ya) ;)



    And always read your writings after you jot them down. You *can*
    edit, you know :)

    ### - believe it or not i always do! meticulously! (laughing, do ya
    think it's 'easy' to write like that?? lol i have to work 'my
    bollocks-off' to write like that! haha...) :)




    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be
    understood by
    everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's
    the
    exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    Yep, Dirac was an unusual scientist. Always looking for meaning.

    ### - heh and here's a perfect example!; you read the FIRST part of this 'fabulous' quote but totally ignored/scooted-over the rest; the
    'important' bit?? (i.e., do you think i quoted this by random? far from
    it! it was strictly contextual and meant/intended to illuminate!)

    so now i'll set you an exercise thang, let's see if you can do it ok?
    (smile, i know you like difficult/challenging things...)

    please 'analise' the above quote of diracs' and explain, as best you can (because it's definitely going to be difficult for you, as it would be
    for anyone...), just 'exactly' what he's referring to when he says: "But
    in poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    the first part is clear enough AND is again, precisely how i've written
    my published material, but the second part of his quote in reference to poetry is a little more ambiguous; HOW could 'poetry' be the 'exact opposite'? (this is/goes deep ok?)

    after which; 'making sense' of some of the things i say may become clearer/easier to you in future ;)

    (this is not a pie-in-the-sky- exercise btw, but a genuine attempt to
    bring you just that little closer into what poetry really + actually is,
    and what it's all about... have fun)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, November 18, 2017 11:06:16
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    You deceptive old bastard :)

    It's your fucking sig! I have around 30 or so sigs I use as well and
    no one (except Dave, once) comments on sigs. Sigs are part of usenet,
    have always BEEN part of usenet - they show a sentiment, a feeling of
    the poster, a belief perhaps - they are NOT part of the post or the
    thread otherwise.

    They are not to be commented on unless intrinsically exceptionally
    beautiful, meaningful or the opposites. They generally aren't even
    consistent with the theme of the OP or the thread follow ups. They
    are just fucking sigs, and this "mention" as you deceptively call it,
    of Dirac, was one of your SIGS!

    You're more crooked than a fucking dog's hind leg :(

    Jeez...


    On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:08:45 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.org>
    wrote:


    ### - here's a repost of the first mention of dirac to you dated 21/10 >last...

    it all 'started' there/here!

    and in the follow-up i went a bit farther...

    (see next repost)





    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? kneel, >>>> bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, and >>>> the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; then >>>> all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the thangs >>>> &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up' siphon-wise >>>> into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion
    extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream
    recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no
    problemo whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the
    jeremy's heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some
    particular blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in'
    the resulting blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood
    by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's
    the exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Saturday, November 18, 2017 03:17:26
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    ### - no, you've got that completely wrong! :)

    it was originally used as a sig (as you call it, but which i call a
    directly pertinent/relevant quote...) but you responded to it, or at least
    the first part of it, while ignoring/overlooking what i consider to be the actual crux of the matter! and which i subsequently pulled you up
    on/pointed out! plus ALSO then challenged you directly with!

    it's perfectly valid old chap and completely topical/germane to what i was attempting to explain to you at the time, so stop being evasive and just
    get on with it!

    it's actually a very interesting + illuminating quote!

    at least have a go?? :)




    On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 03:06:16 -0000, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    You deceptive old bastard :)

    It's your fucking sig! I have around 30 or so sigs I use as well and
    no one (except Dave, once) comments on sigs. Sigs are part of usenet,
    have always BEEN part of usenet - they show a sentiment, a feeling of
    the poster, a belief perhaps - they are NOT part of the post or the
    thread otherwise.

    They are not to be commented on unless intrinsically exceptionally
    beautiful, meaningful or the opposites. They generally aren't even consistent with the theme of the OP or the thread follow ups. They
    are just fucking sigs, and this "mention" as you deceptively call it,
    of Dirac, was one of your SIGS!

    You're more crooked than a fucking dog's hind leg :(

    Jeez...


    On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:08:45 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.org>
    wrote:


    ### - here's a repost of the first mention of dirac to you dated 21/10
    last...

    it all 'started' there/here!

    and in the follow-up i went a bit farther...

    (see next repost)





    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there?
    kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever' >>>>> grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists
    have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened,
    and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment;
    then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the
    thangs
    &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up'
    siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream
    about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called >>>> "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion >>>> extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California >>>> which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It >>>> appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants >>>> has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream >>>> recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no
    problemo whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and
    the
    jeremy's heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some
    particular blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in'
    the resulting blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood
    by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry,
    it's
    the exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus



    --
    Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, November 18, 2017 17:53:35
    From: thangolossus@gmail.com

    I've been busy. I've got some stuff happening which I can live without
    but life brings things every moment which we can do without so, I need
    to resolve. To your post about Dirac: time to address.

    Dirac was an eccentric but this "quote" is taken out of context and is
    *not* the original statement he made. This is what he really said to Oppenheimer and this is the context and setting in which he said it:

    "Ever the intellectual peacock, Oppenheimer ensured that his
    colleagues knew he was thinking about more than physics: his eclectic
    reading list included F. Scott Fitzgerald’s collection of short
    stories Winter Dreams, Chekhov’s play Ivanov and the works of the
    German lyric poet Johann Hölderlin. He was also composing verse, a
    hobby that puzzled Dirac.

    ‘I don’t see how you can work on physics and write poetry at the same time,’ he remarked during one of their walks. ‘In science, you want to
    say something nobody knew before, in words everyone can understand. In
    poetry, you are bound to say something that everybody knows already in
    words that nobody can understand.’

    For decades to come, Oppenheimer liked to recount this anecdote over
    cocktails, no doubt having polished Dirac’s original phrasing to give
    it the bite of one of Wilde’s paradoxes"

    Dirac did not say ""In science one tries to tell people, in such a way
    as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew
    before. But in poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    In facr, Dirac was never much interested in poetry. I took this
    excerpt from a well known book on Dirac - "The Strangest Man, The
    Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius - Graham Farmelo". I've
    uploaded it for you here:

    https://ufile.io/iu4pv

    Because now the reality of what Dirac said in the correct historic
    context and setting is completely different, in fact diametrically
    opposed, to what you think he meant, I don't see any use in responding
    to what you posted. To do so is to tilt at windmills in my view.

    Do you think I'm wrong? I'm open to reason.



    On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:22:52 -0000, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    ### - and this is the follow-up, reposted just for you ;)

    in this one (seeing as you totally ignored the last part of his quote) i >challenge you to actually LOOK at it and decipher... calling your
    attention 'directly' to it...

    which you then promptly... forgot??

    (many might think in an express effort to weasel out of doing it? only i >don't think you're a weasel, i just think it's possibly too difficult for >you, or at least that's what YOU maybe think, only again i don't think it
    IS too hard for you, just difficult... and that you'll understand more
    when you study it and then apply 'some' of your resulting conclusions to
    my particular style of writing + that of others as regards poetry...)

    have a go can't you? it's actually very interesting! and, is potentially
    an illuminating addition to what you think you already know about poetry...

    i DID your exercise, now please do mine, and then maybe we can 'move-on'
    from our current impasse...

    imho dirac is stating something of extreme importance that shouldn't BE >overlooked, but instead studied at length and in-depth until a new light >dawns upon the subject for you personally...

    and then perhaps we can talk/discuss/debate to our little hearts-content :)




    On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:08:21 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    thang ornerythinchus wrote...

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store
    world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there?
    kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they 'ever' >>>>>> grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists >>>>>> have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, >>>>>> and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; >>>>>> then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the
    thangs &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up'
    siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image
    huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of
    this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream >>>>> about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down
    somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself called >>>>> "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this was >>>>> unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental delusion >>>>> extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes", all >>>>> 7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known
    only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's
    original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in California >>>>> which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual
    immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to
    the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct called >>>>> apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism
    "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion
    assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. It >>>>> appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban inhabitants >>>>> has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living soul >>>>> as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the dream >>>>> recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the
    meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability *must* >>>>> not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no problemo >>>> whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the
    jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some particular >>>> blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the
    resulting
    blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    While I was being a little tongue in cheek there is a core reality in
    what I said. You do waffle. It's hard to understand what you mean
    mate because you ain't no poet and you're not really very lucid
    sometimes in your ramblings.

    ### - heh, i 'know' you have difficultly understanding me, and that what
    i say sometimes seems to make 'no sense' to you? (i get that reaction a
    lot heh...)

    truth is: YOU have to make the effort to 'make sense' of it (that's a
    clue btw) ;)



    Just practice clear writing. It's not too hard. Idea -> draft ->
    final. Keep it short and assume your reader has a simple education.
    Punctuate, always punctuate - and observe the normal grammatical rules
    you were presumably taught in school. Practice makes perfect.

    ### - haha, the material i've published was written in precisely that
    manner!

    that, however, is NOT the way i 'talk' in conversation (that's 'another'
    clue for ya) ;)



    And always read your writings after you jot them down. You *can*
    edit, you know :)

    ### - believe it or not i always do! meticulously! (laughing, do ya
    think it's 'easy' to write like that?? lol i have to work 'my
    bollocks-off' to write like that! haha...) :)




    ---------

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be
    understood by
    everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's
    the
    exact opposite." -- paul dirac :)

    Yep, Dirac was an unusual scientist. Always looking for meaning.

    ### - heh and here's a perfect example!; you read the FIRST part of this
    'fabulous' quote but totally ignored/scooted-over the rest; the
    'important' bit?? (i.e., do you think i quoted this by random? far from
    it! it was strictly contextual and meant/intended to illuminate!)

    so now i'll set you an exercise thang, let's see if you can do it ok?
    (smile, i know you like difficult/challenging things...)

    please 'analise' the above quote of diracs' and explain, as best you can
    (because it's definitely going to be difficult for you, as it would be
    for anyone...), just 'exactly' what he's referring to when he says: "But
    in poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    the first part is clear enough AND is again, precisely how i've written
    my published material, but the second part of his quote in reference to
    poetry is a little more ambiguous; HOW could 'poetry' be the 'exact
    opposite'? (this is/goes deep ok?)

    after which; 'making sense' of some of the things i say may become
    clearer/easier to you in future ;)

    (this is not a pie-in-the-sky- exercise btw, but a genuine attempt to
    bring you just that little closer into what poetry really + actually is,
    and what it's all about... have fun)

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jeremy H. Denisovan@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, November 18, 2017 12:01:10
    From: david.j.worrell@gmail.com

    The simple self-flattering implication is that Slider imagines himself
    to be profoundly poetic, but like most/all of his other beliefs,
    there's little to no evidence of this actually being the case.

    My finger is fine. See? ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to david.j.worrell@gmail.com on Saturday, November 18, 2017 21:04:30
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:01:10 -0000, Jeremy H. Denisovan <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> wrote:

    The simple self-flattering implication is that Slider imagines himself
    to be profoundly poetic, but like most/all of his other beliefs,
    there's little to no evidence of this actually being the case.

    My finger is fine. See? ;)

    ### - well ok then, but at least just take it outta yo' ass? ;)

    (boom-boom! + crash of cymbals heh...)

    plus, fyi and future reference; besides coming in different forms, poems
    were originally: sung?

    and although not claiming to be particularly profound and/or talented
    (profane yes, profound/talented takes a little longer heh...) i have, as
    you know, already + humbly submitted my 'poems' (or at least as many as
    i've found currently as, as many again are still missing...) to be perused
    for public consideration?

    https://www.youtube.com/user/ageinhippie/videos

    i may not be 'much' of a poet personally, but am definitely on the side OF
    the poets!

    and that of their place/importance in the grander scheme of things...

    all poets are outsiders, but not all outsiders are poets ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to All on Saturday, November 18, 2017 22:00:53
    From: slider@anashram.org

    ### - actually i'll edit that just slightly to be that more apt:

    all 'good' poets are outsiders, but not all outsiders are good poets.

    :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Saturday, November 18, 2017 16:33:42
    From: slider@nanashram.com

    ### - actually i quite like it thang + well done for tracking it down to
    the origin of the quote and later one derived from via oppenheimer
    (smile), as it isn't 'completely' opposed to what i was originally saying/suggesting re poetry and my particular way of writing, that
    although i much prefer oppenheimer's later polished/perfected version (something old 'Oppie' has then apparently 'taken' it to mean to/for him personally as the person 'interested' in poetry, verses dirac's puzzlement
    in the matter - which is actually quite similar to your own in regards to
    me - and which oppemheimer (as the budding poet) has subsequently
    'distilled' into what he feels is actually more accurate when attempting
    to 'describe' poetry - just as i am to you - imho even adds an extra
    colourful note to the whole thing 'without' totally detracting from it!
    and that's so cool :)

    i.e., in this 'play' we're apparently enacting; you're thus playing the
    role of dirac the pure/logical scientist, and i the role of oppenheimer
    the scientist + also aspiring poet...

    using my own words here; dirac is basically saying to Oppie: i can't
    really see the point of poetry as it appears to be deliberately confusing
    about things people 'already' know, whereas in science we're attempting to
    make 'new' discoveries and pass that information along in terms everyone
    can more easily understand... and 'from' this oppenheimer has extrapolated/distilled what he considers to actually be a clearer
    definition of poetry per se; something that's almost impossible to
    define/nail down in the easy/convenient language of rational science...

    it's very interesting! that the quote i liked was actually derived (by
    Oppie) from dirac's 'critique' of poetry rather than from something dirac
    was actually thinking himself! i.e., here's me thinking that this
    dirac-fellow was quite an astute person, one fully aware of what poetry is
    and what it attempts to do? when in fact he's putting it down! (wtf are
    you doing even 'dealing' with poetry Oppie?? we're supposed to be
    scientists!?) and so really this isn't even 'about' dirac and is instead
    about what 'oppenheimer' (the poet) 'got-out' of their exchange in which
    he turns dirac's own dismissive words around to to answer him with! (and
    that's actually very cool indeed! oppenheimer just went quite a ways UP in
    my books as a result!)

    so now we come back to you and me here, more or less wrestling with
    exactly the same thing; my novel use of language versus your puzzled
    plaint & insistence for me to talk more clearly and precisely as befits reason... this is very good! (am actually very pleased! heh...)

    AND our current 'situation' hasn't actually changed any! only my opinion
    of dirac has changed! (dirac is thus out! and oppenheimer is now IN
    lol...) very good! :)

    that is wasn't just a simple misquote, but was in fact something
    oppenheimer 'came-up' with to clarify the matter as an answer to the
    dirac's of this world! (brilliant actually considering just how hard it is
    to nail poetry down? heh...)

    iow: dirac didn't 'intend' to mean that at all, yet has Oppie turned
    dirac's own words around in order to give him (and others like him) a
    pretty good answer/definition to a very difficult question!

    and so, my friend, the question still actually stands albeit slightly more convoluted! :)

    what then did 'Oppenheimer' mean/intend by 'constructing' this quote to
    say what it then says!

    the first part is very clear: dirac's words;

    "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood
    by everyone, something that no one ever knew before."

    and Oppenheimer comes back/retorts with:

    "But in poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    what was 'oppenheimer' trying to say?

    and more importantly: why :)

    (you've got 2 choices here thang; to accept the above premise and just get
    on with answering it as presented; in which case you'll get a pat on the
    back from moi for the brave attempt, or, to go back over it and attempt to
    tear it all apart so you don't, in fact, even HAVE to answer it; but in
    which case i may call you a weasel for being so cowardly and sticking like
    glue to what you already know hehehe...)

    PS. i don't mind first clarifying 'any' of the above in order to get you started right in on it, IF there's any confusion on your part here that
    is, but if you're just gonna deny the whole thing and harp-on dirac's 'original' words in an effort to just dismiss it altogether (which is what
    that coward jeremy would probably/likely opt for...) then there's really
    no point in pursuing it...

    am personally rather hoping you'll go for it and make the attempt, i'll willingly provide all the help i can to help you do it, and we 'might'
    even have some jolly good fun in the process!

    i like fun!

    AND... old 'dirac' (you) might even 'learn' something (about slider) here!
    ;)

    go for it!






    On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:53:35 -0000, thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    I've been busy. I've got some stuff happening which I can live without
    but life brings things every moment which we can do without so, I need
    to resolve. To your post about Dirac: time to address.

    Dirac was an eccentric but this "quote" is taken out of context and is
    *not* the original statement he made. This is what he really said to Oppenheimer and this is the context and setting in which he said it:

    "Ever the intellectual peacock, Oppenheimer ensured that his
    colleagues knew he was thinking about more than physics: his eclectic
    reading list included F. Scott Fitzgerald’s collection of short
    stories Winter Dreams, Chekhov’s play Ivanov and the works of the
    German lyric poet Johann Hölderlin. He was also composing verse, a
    hobby that puzzled Dirac.

    ‘I don’t see how you can work on physics and write poetry at the same time,’ he remarked during one of their walks. ‘In science, you want to say something nobody knew before, in words everyone can understand. In poetry, you are bound to say something that everybody knows already in
    words that nobody can understand.’

    For decades to come, Oppenheimer liked to recount this anecdote over cocktails, no doubt having polished Dirac’s original phrasing to give
    it the bite of one of Wilde’s paradoxes"

    Dirac did not say ""In science one tries to tell people, in such a way
    as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew
    before. But in poetry, it's the exact opposite."

    In facr, Dirac was never much interested in poetry. I took this
    excerpt from a well known book on Dirac - "The Strangest Man, The
    Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius - Graham Farmelo". I've
    uploaded it for you here:

    https://ufile.io/iu4pv

    Because now the reality of what Dirac said in the correct historic
    context and setting is completely different, in fact diametrically
    opposed, to what you think he meant, I don't see any use in responding
    to what you posted. To do so is to tilt at windmills in my view.

    Do you think I'm wrong? I'm open to reason.



    On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:22:52 -0000, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    ### - and this is the follow-up, reposted just for you ;)

    in this one (seeing as you totally ignored the last part of his quote) i
    challenge you to actually LOOK at it and decipher... calling your
    attention 'directly' to it...

    which you then promptly... forgot??

    (many might think in an express effort to weasel out of doing it? only i
    don't think you're a weasel, i just think it's possibly too difficult
    for
    you, or at least that's what YOU maybe think, only again i don't think
    it
    IS too hard for you, just difficult... and that you'll understand more
    when you study it and then apply 'some' of your resulting conclusions to
    my particular style of writing + that of others as regards poetry...)

    have a go can't you? it's actually very interesting! and, is potentially
    an illuminating addition to what you think you already know about
    poetry...

    i DID your exercise, now please do mine, and then maybe we can 'move-on'
    from our current impasse...

    imho dirac is stating something of extreme importance that shouldn't BE
    overlooked, but instead studied at length and in-depth until a new light
    dawns upon the subject for you personally...

    and then perhaps we can talk/discuss/debate to our little
    hearts-content :)




    On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:08:21 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com> wrote:

    thang ornerythinchus wrote...

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:37:15 +0100, thang ornerythinchus
    <thangolossus@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:28:18 +0100, slider <slider@nanashram.com>
    wrote:

    whisperoutloud wrote/muses...

    I'll tell you about one of the
    dreams because it was so damn real and
    it might have some significience. This
    gas station / convenience store had burned
    down. I got there after the firemen soaked
    the hell out of the place. The two owners
    were sad that there life savings was gone now.
    This seemed to be a place where i knew alot of
    people who frequented this place. It had other
    buildings on the property. Was sort of like
    a mecca or oasis setting but was here in the West.
    I felt sorry for these people because it was such
    a cool place to come to. Oh well, there's always
    another gas station or 7-11 out there.

    ### - wallyworld got burned down?

    quite sad really because there ISN'T another one out there...

    (sounds about right all this above: gas-station/convenience-store >>>>>>> world?
    'mecca' is right! lol @ how humanity flocked to/worshiped there? >>>>>>> kneel,
    bow, pray all you peeps to the gods of high finance! will they
    'ever'
    grow-up on this planet of the apes?? probably not but the buddhists >>>>>>> have a
    nice idea; that when a third of the world IS actually enlightened, >>>>>>> and
    the
    next third is definitely 'on-the-road' to that same enlightenment; >>>>>>> then
    all the pigs & fishes (the hardest of all to enlighten: all the
    thangs &
    jeremy's of this world lol...) will all be/get 'sucked-up'
    siphon-wise
    into the bigger picture and then aaall will be well... nice image >>>>>>> huh...)

    Here, for all those lurkers out there, let me try to make sense of >>>>>> this:

    1. This is a reply to the original post which related Chris's dream >>>>>> about a gas station and some related popular buildings burning down >>>>>> somewhere near the Cali fires.

    2. Brian transposes an imaginary concept known only to himself
    called
    "wally world" for the gas station.

    3. Brian states that his imaginary construct burnt down and this
    was
    unfortunate because there wasn't another such imaginary construct
    anywhere in the Western USA.

    4. Brian sweeps off into a state of almost hysterical mental
    delusion
    extending his imaginary construct from Chris's original
    California-based location to global range, scooping up all of
    humanity, all 7 billion souls, and implementing another imaginary
    construct called "planet of the apes".

    5. In this global imaginary construct, the "planet of the apes",
    all
    7 billion souls make obeisance to another imaginary construct known >>>>>> only to Brian which he calls "the gods of high finance".

    6. Intermission - we are now a great distance indeed from Chris's >>>>>> original dream regarding the immolation of a gas station in
    California
    which one could be forgiven for thinking has a cause in the actual >>>>>> immolation of parts of California.

    7. Brian questions the maturity of all 7 billion souls on this
    "planet of the apes".

    8. Brian superimposes a snippet from an unnamed source relating to >>>>>> the world's fourth largest religion over all 7 billion souls. He
    states that 2.33 billion souls are another imaginary construct
    called
    apparently by the unnamed source of the snippet of alleged buddhism >>>>>> "pigs and fishes". Brian names two souls within this 2.33 billion >>>>>> assemblage as myself and Jeremy, another contributor to this NG.

    Analysis:

    Brian is an older person living a solitary existence, perhaps
    subsistence, in one of the largest and oldest cities in the world. >>>>>> It
    appears that his solitary existence amidst 9 million urban
    inhabitants
    has permitted his mind to develop anomalous constructs and a
    disturbingly perverse world view which paints every other living
    soul
    as unworthy of existence.

    Typical of such "loners", the absence of human referential guides
    renders him unable to understand let alone quantify the extent to
    which his mind has developed gross abnormalities.

    Therefore, at the slightest stimulus, Brian's abnormality of mind
    mutates simple renditions of innocuous circumstances such as the
    dream
    recounted by Chris in the original post into sweeping delusions the >>>>>> meaning of which Brian is quite incapable of expressing
    comprehensibly.

    Clearly, Brian, although he will not and for his own stability
    *must*
    not admit it, needs help. In a city of 9 million souls there are
    avenues for such assistance which can be quite anonymous and most
    sympathetic, not to mention competent.

    ### - (laughing...) it's a simple poetic 'allusion', metaphor AND
    analogy
    all rolled into one ya twit, one which am sure chris 'gets' no
    problemo
    whatsoever, easy-peasey... it's only difficult for you (and the
    jeremy's
    heh) of this world is all... you personally, also have some
    particular
    blind spots in this area, and when you attempt to 'fill-in' the
    resulting
    blanks you come up with all this crap?? hehehe...

    you CAN'T analyse Art!

    one can merely make the attempt to understand it ;)

    While I was being a little tongue in cheek there is a core reality in
    what I said. You do waffle. It's hard to understand what you mean
    mate because you ain't no poet and you're not really very lucid
    sometimes in your ramblings.

    ### - heh, i 'know' you have difficultly understanding me, and that
    what
    i say sometimes seems to make 'no sense' to you? (i get that reaction a
    lot heh...)


    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)