• Supreme Court to weigh New York's limit on carrying a handgun

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, September 21, 2021 17:24:21
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.trump
    XPost: alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns, ny.politics
    From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/20/supreme-court-weigh-new- yorks-limit-carrying-handg/

    The Supreme Court will grapple with the right to bear arms outside the
    home during the upcoming term in a case court watchers are calling
    significant because it’s been more than a decade since the justices
    weighed the limits of the Second Amendment.

    Democrats are concerned the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court
    will curtail the government’s ability to impose regulations and
    requirements on gun ownership.

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s presence on the bench — she’s one of the three Supreme Court picks former President Donald Trump made during his one term
    in office — especially worries progressives because of a pro-gun opinion
    she wrote while serving as a judge on the U.S. Circuit Court for the
    Seventh Circuit.

    “Gun rights advocates are hoping that her addition will make five justices
    who are more willing to take a more active role and start striking down
    what most people consider gun safety rules,” said Elliot Mincberg, senior fellow with People for the American Way.

    While on the 7th Circuit, Justice Barrett authored a dissent, disagreeing
    with her colleagues over bans on convicted felons possessing firearms.

    In the case, a nonviolent felon challenged the restriction on Second
    Amendment grounds. Justice Barrett’s position was that legislators have an interest in stripping violent felons from owning guns — not nonviolent
    felons.

    Her dissent was lauded by gun rights’ supporters.

    But in the New York case, the justices will consider New York’s scheme on granting a license to carry to applicants.

    Two men and the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association are
    challenging the state’s law requiring anyone who wants to carry a handgun outside the home to apply for a license and show “proper cause” for the
    need to carry the gun.

    Robert Nash was denied his license despite pointing to a string of
    robberies in his neighborhood and verifying that he had taken an “advanced firearm training course.”

    Brendan Koch, similarly, applied for a license, noting his “extensive experience” with handling firearms in a safe manner.

    But New York officials denied both men their licenses, saying they did not
    show a “proper cause” for carrying a gun in self-defense.

    The men and the New York gun rights group argue courts have split rulings
    over a state’s discretion in denying the right to keep and bear arms
    outside the house.

    “Despite the wealth of authority confirming that the Second Amendment guarantees the people’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense
    outside the home, several courts of appeals continue to resist that
    conclusion, leaving the law in a state of chaos and the fundamental right
    to carry a firearm dependent on where one lives,” they argued in court
    papers.

    But the state of New York contends the Second Amendment right is not
    unlimited and that the state has had laws regulating the carrying of
    firearms in public since 1913. They said it’s not impossible to meet the “proper cause” requirement.

    ?“This flexible standard, which numerous New York residents have
    successfully satisfied, generally requires a showing that the applicant
    has a nonspeculative need for self-defense,” the state’s court filing
    read.

    The lower courts ruled for New York officials, upholding the state’s
    licensing scheme. But the men took the case to the high court and at least
    four of the justices voted to hear the legal conflict, announcing in April
    they would review the case.

    Lawyers for both sides will present oral arguments in person before the justices on Nov. 3.

    A decision is expected by the end of June next year. The case is New York
    State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen, superintendent of New
    York State Police.

    Carrie Severino, chief counsel for the Judicial Crisis Network, said
    strict licensing schemes for carrying a gun outside the house are a
    problem across the country — not just in New York.

    “It really has to do with the overlap of the open carry and closed carry
    laws that work together to make it impossible for individuals to have a
    gun in any sense outside their home,” she said. “That is something that is going to have an impact much further than New York.”

    But she views the conservative majority on the high court as encouraging, saying there are justices who will protect constitutional rights.

    It’s been about a decade since the justices grappled with the limits of
    the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the high court
    ruled 5-4 that it was unlawful for D.C. officials to restrict the
    possession of firearms inside the home.

    At the time, the makeup of the high court was much different. Five of the justices who took part in considering the Heller case are no longer on the bench.

    Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel
    A. Alito Jr. and Justice Stephen G. Breyer were all on the court at that
    time — and they still remain on the bench. All but Justice Breyer ruled
    against the District of Columbia’s restriction.

    Daniel Goldberg, legal director for the Alliance for Justice, said it’s
    “deeply concerning” that the new 6-3 conservative majority with Mr.
    Trump’s three appointments will now weigh the right to carry firearms
    outside the home.

    “President Trump — backed by the NRA — made clear that one of his litmus
    tests was justices that would turn back the clock when it came to the
    ability of the state and local governments to protect citizens from gun violence,” Mr. Goldberg said.

    “I hope I am wrong, but I think these justices — the ultraconservative
    justices on the court — are on the court with the backing of the NRA, and
    I think are teed up to handcuff the ability of local officials to keep
    their citizens safe,” he added.

    Comments:

    White Lightning
    22m
    "Limit?" New Yorkers need to carry as many handguns as they can.

    AwakeNow
    6h
    In New York, if you want to carry in more places, you have to own more
    homes.

    Next year, ownership will be re-defined to exclude bank-ownership (aka Mortgages).

    If you call this harassment, you will be canceled and audited. Power to
    the people.

    stosh
    Sep 20
    Democrats are concerned the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court
    will curtail the government’s ability to impose regulations and
    requirements on gun ownership.


    RBG's legacy.

    Scott C Bailey
    Sep 20
    I find it hard to feel safe from gun violence, when criminals are the only
    ones with guns!!!

    1



    --
    "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
    recover with no after effects.

    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
    Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

    Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
    ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Leroy N. Soetoro@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, September 23, 2021 17:21:31
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.trump
    XPost: alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns, ny.politics
    From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/20/supreme-court-weigh-new- yorks-limit-carrying-handg/

    The Supreme Court will grapple with the right to bear arms outside the
    home during the upcoming term in a case court watchers are calling
    significant because it’s been more than a decade since the justices
    weighed the limits of the Second Amendment.

    Democrats are concerned the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court
    will curtail the government’s ability to impose regulations and
    requirements on gun ownership.

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s presence on the bench — she’s one of the three Supreme Court picks former President Donald Trump made during his one term
    in office — especially worries progressives because of a pro-gun opinion
    she wrote while serving as a judge on the U.S. Circuit Court for the
    Seventh Circuit.

    “Gun rights advocates are hoping that her addition will make five justices
    who are more willing to take a more active role and start striking down
    what most people consider gun safety rules,” said Elliot Mincberg, senior fellow with People for the American Way.

    While on the 7th Circuit, Justice Barrett authored a dissent, disagreeing
    with her colleagues over bans on convicted felons possessing firearms.

    In the case, a nonviolent felon challenged the restriction on Second
    Amendment grounds. Justice Barrett’s position was that legislators have an interest in stripping violent felons from owning guns — not nonviolent
    felons.

    Her dissent was lauded by gun rights’ supporters.

    But in the New York case, the justices will consider New York’s scheme on granting a license to carry to applicants.

    Two men and the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association are
    challenging the state’s law requiring anyone who wants to carry a handgun outside the home to apply for a license and show “proper cause” for the
    need to carry the gun.

    Robert Nash was denied his license despite pointing to a string of
    robberies in his neighborhood and verifying that he had taken an “advanced firearm training course.”

    Brendan Koch, similarly, applied for a license, noting his “extensive experience” with handling firearms in a safe manner.

    But New York officials denied both men their licenses, saying they did not
    show a “proper cause” for carrying a gun in self-defense.

    The men and the New York gun rights group argue courts have split rulings
    over a state’s discretion in denying the right to keep and bear arms
    outside the house.

    “Despite the wealth of authority confirming that the Second Amendment guarantees the people’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense
    outside the home, several courts of appeals continue to resist that
    conclusion, leaving the law in a state of chaos and the fundamental right
    to carry a firearm dependent on where one lives,” they argued in court
    papers.

    But the state of New York contends the Second Amendment right is not
    unlimited and that the state has had laws regulating the carrying of
    firearms in public since 1913. They said it’s not impossible to meet the “proper cause” requirement.

    ?“This flexible standard, which numerous New York residents have
    successfully satisfied, generally requires a showing that the applicant
    has a nonspeculative need for self-defense,” the state’s court filing
    read.

    The lower courts ruled for New York officials, upholding the state’s
    licensing scheme. But the men took the case to the high court and at least
    four of the justices voted to hear the legal conflict, announcing in April
    they would review the case.

    Lawyers for both sides will present oral arguments in person before the justices on Nov. 3.

    A decision is expected by the end of June next year. The case is New York
    State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen, superintendent of New
    York State Police.

    Carrie Severino, chief counsel for the Judicial Crisis Network, said
    strict licensing schemes for carrying a gun outside the house are a
    problem across the country — not just in New York.

    “It really has to do with the overlap of the open carry and closed carry
    laws that work together to make it impossible for individuals to have a
    gun in any sense outside their home,” she said. “That is something that is going to have an impact much further than New York.”

    But she views the conservative majority on the high court as encouraging, saying there are justices who will protect constitutional rights.

    It’s been about a decade since the justices grappled with the limits of
    the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the high court
    ruled 5-4 that it was unlawful for D.C. officials to restrict the
    possession of firearms inside the home.

    At the time, the makeup of the high court was much different. Five of the justices who took part in considering the Heller case are no longer on the bench.

    Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel
    A. Alito Jr. and Justice Stephen G. Breyer were all on the court at that
    time — and they still remain on the bench. All but Justice Breyer ruled
    against the District of Columbia’s restriction.

    Daniel Goldberg, legal director for the Alliance for Justice, said it’s
    “deeply concerning” that the new 6-3 conservative majority with Mr.
    Trump’s three appointments will now weigh the right to carry firearms
    outside the home.

    “President Trump — backed by the NRA — made clear that one of his litmus
    tests was justices that would turn back the clock when it came to the
    ability of the state and local governments to protect citizens from gun violence,” Mr. Goldberg said.

    “I hope I am wrong, but I think these justices — the ultraconservative
    justices on the court — are on the court with the backing of the NRA, and
    I think are teed up to handcuff the ability of local officials to keep
    their citizens safe,” he added.

    Comments:

    White Lightning
    22m
    "Limit?" New Yorkers need to carry as many handguns as they can.

    AwakeNow
    6h
    In New York, if you want to carry in more places, you have to own more
    homes.

    Next year, ownership will be re-defined to exclude bank-ownership (aka Mortgages).

    If you call this harassment, you will be canceled and audited. Power to
    the people.

    stosh
    Sep 20
    Democrats are concerned the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court
    will curtail the government’s ability to impose regulations and
    requirements on gun ownership.


    RBG's legacy.

    Scott C Bailey
    Sep 20
    I find it hard to feel safe from gun violence, when criminals are the only
    ones with guns!!!

    1



    --
    "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
    recover with no after effects.

    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
    Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

    Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
    ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Scout@1:229/2 to Leroy N. Soetoro on Thursday, September 23, 2021 15:58:15
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, alt.politics.usa.constitution, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: ny.politics
    From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net

    "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov> wrote in message news:lnsADAE696086D226F089P2473@0.0.0.1...
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/20/supreme-court-weigh-new- yorks-limit-carrying-handg/

    The Supreme Court will grapple with the right to bear arms outside the
    home during the upcoming term in a case court watchers are calling significant because it's been more than a decade since the justices
    weighed the limits of the Second Amendment.

    Democrats are concerned the 6-3 conservative majority on the high court
    will curtail the government's ability to impose regulations and
    requirements on gun ownership.

    ROTFLMAO.... So they think the Constitution wouldn't matter in the least
    there?

    Then they wonder why we are so upset with the fake and biased media....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)