• Re: Too Bad Clod Isn't Around to See This...

    From FPP@1:229/2 to Ubiquitous on Thursday, April 11, 2019 21:25:44
    From: fredp151@gmail.com

    On 4/11/19 8:33 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    In article <q8o3md$8l3$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    In article <q8ntd0$pgc$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Here's even more lies. They have to be lies, because this article >>>>>>> describes a woman successfully defending herself and her child with a >>>>>>> gun against an armed intruder.

    This is easily disprovable by just asking clod, who will verify that >>>>>>> it's impossible for this to have happened.

    A North Carolina mom is lucky to be alive after engaging in a shootout >>>>>>> with a suspected burglar early Wednesday morning after he allegedly >>>>>>> broke into the home she shares with her 10-year-old son.

    Police in Burlington, North Carolina received an emergency call from the
    home in the 600-block of Everett Street around 3:55AM.

    They said the unnamed mom, 31, and her son were both asleep earlier when
    she heard someone breaking into their home through the kitchen window. >>>>>>>
    The mom retrieved the handgun she owns and confronted the suspected 20 >>>>>>> to 29-year-old male burglar who also was armed with a semi-automatic >>>>>>> pistol, police said. The suspect opened fire on the mom who returned >>>>>>> fire, forcing her attacker to flee.

    Is the headline wrong? It's burglary if you enter the premisis with >>>>>> intent to steal. Isn't it robbery if you bring a gun, especially if you >>>>>> litterally shoot at the homeowner or legal occupant?

    Robbery involves a second party; burglary is if no one else is there. >>>>
    Nonsense. Burglary is a crime of intent, just as I said. An unarmed thief >>>> enters a shop for the purpose of stealing has committed a burglary upon >>>> entering the shop. It's burglary even if the theft was thwarted. The
    shopkeeper or a clerk is always present during regular business hours.

    If a clerk is present, it's a robbery.
    It's a burglary if no one is around.

    You're an ignoramus.

    Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

    I see the rusty trombone has tooted out another of his great lines...

    --
    Trump: "I'm rich." (* but you can't see my taxes.)
    "I'm smart." (* but you can't see my grades.)
    "I'm totally exonerated." (* but you can't see the report.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@1:229/2 to Ubiquitous on Friday, April 12, 2019 03:25:35
    From: ahk@chinet.com

    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    ahk@chinet.com wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Here's even more lies. They have to be lies, because this article >>>>>>>describes a woman successfully defending herself and her child with a >>>>>>>gun against an armed intruder.

    This is easily disprovable by just asking clod, who will verify that >>>>>>>it's impossible for this to have happened.

    A North Carolina mom is lucky to be alive after engaging in a shootout >>>>>>>with a suspected burglar early Wednesday morning after he allegedly >>>>>>>broke into the home she shares with her 10-year-old son.

    Police in Burlington, North Carolina received an emergency call >>>>>>>from the home in the 600-block of Everett Street around 3:55AM.

    They said the unnamed mom, 31, and her son were both asleep >>>>>>>earlier when she heard someone breaking into their home through >>>>>>>the kitchen window.

    The mom retrieved the handgun she owns and confronted the suspected 20 >>>>>>>to 29-year-old male burglar who also was armed with a semi-automatic >>>>>>>pistol, police said. The suspect opened fire on the mom who returned >>>>>>>fire, forcing her attacker to flee.

    Is the headline wrong? It's burglary if you enter the premisis with >>>>>>intent to steal. Isn't it robbery if you bring a gun, especially if you >>>>>>litterally shoot at the homeowner or legal occupant?

    Robbery involves a second party; burglary is if no one else is there.

    Nonsense. Burglary is a crime of intent, just as I said. An unarmed thief >>>>enters a shop for the purpose of stealing has committed a burglary upon >>>>entering the shop. It's burglary even if the theft was thwarted. The >>>>shopkeeper or a clerk is always present during regular business hours.

    If a clerk is present, it's a robbery.
    It's a burglary if no one is around.

    You're an ignoramus.

    Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

    It's not an argument, Ubi. It's the basic definition of "robbery" from
    the criminal code. Knock it the fuck off or I'll Norm Chomsky you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)