From: ant@zimage.comANT

I like its beginning part (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7CDPUTxEIA),
but not the rest of it since I'm not familiar with that series it is
making fun of.


Matt Garvey <mxg77@po.cwru.edu> wrote:

Are titles paid by the word now? Why can't this or Warrin' Priests include "part 1" in there? Anyway, I guess I'll reserve judgment till next week, but despite the tone so dark Fox had to add a viewer discretion warning it's not bad so far. However:

the Fargo-esque parody note that it's all made up may explain why characters are dying off, but then what reason do we have to care about the suspense or mystery? Eh. Also, is this supposed to be the same Barbara we saw with Sideshow Mel all those years
ago? They look nothing alike, even in the old photos, and yet this could have been such a great deep callback (still allowing her to look and sound like the Minnesotan type here, perhaps through an evolution in looks). It's not as bad as the total
recasting of Sarah Wiggum, at least. Till next week!

Previous episode stuff
9F07: Linda Ronstadt reference, of a sort
5F06: A Barbara in a relationship with Mel was seen, but was thin and trendy looking with (appropriately) green hair then

Alternate version alert
Even as a joke, that little Netflix-y corner popup announcing the start of the next episode is very annoying. But note that tonight it said 6 days, 23 hours, etc. I would not be surprised if next Sunday's encore before Part 2 updates it to 5 minutes or

something. On the other hand, maybe it won't; it is, after all, before a commercial break, not in the last minute. I'll be recording just in case!

--
It's too dark already. Can we please stick with daylight saving forever? :( Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
/ /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: mxg77@po.cwru.edu

Are titles paid by the word now? Why can't this or Warrin' Priests include "part 1" in there? Anyway, I guess I'll reserve judgment till next week, but despite the tone so dark Fox had to add a viewer discretion warning it's not bad so far. However: the
Fargo-esque parody note that it's all made up may explain why characters are dying off, but then what reason do we have to care about the suspense or mystery? Eh. Also, is this supposed to be the same Barbara we saw with Sideshow Mel all those years ago?
They look nothing alike, even in the old photos, and yet this could have been such a great deep callback (still allowing her to look and sound like the Minnesotan type here, perhaps through an evolution in looks). It's not as bad as the total recasting
of Sarah Wiggum, at least. Till next week!

Previous episode stuff
9F07: Linda Ronstadt reference, of a sort
5F06: A Barbara in a relationship with Mel was seen, but was thin and trendy looking with (appropriately) green hair then

Alternate version alert
Even as a joke, that little Netflix-y corner popup announcing the start of the next episode is very annoying. But note that tonight it said 6 days, 23 hours, etc. I would not be surprised if next Sunday's encore before Part 2 updates it to 5 minutes or
something. On the other hand, maybe it won't; it is, after all, before a commercial break, not in the last minute. I'll be recording just in case!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)